Mitigate Risks Associated With Outsourcing Services

If you outsource services such as payroll processing, loan servicing, data center/co-location/IT Managed Services, Software as a Service (SaaS), or medical claims processing, you rely on the service provider to keep your data secure, maintain confidentiality, integrity of processing, availability of services or systems, and/or privacy.  However, AAFCPAs reminds clients that outsourcing may expose your organization to risk and underscores the need for effective vendor due diligence.

The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants states “Management of a user entity is responsible for assessing and addressing risks faced by the user entity related to financial reporting, compliance with laws and regulations, and the efficiency and effectiveness of operations. When a user entity engages a service organization to perform key processes or functions, the entity exposes itself to additional risks related to the service organization’s system. Although management of a user entity can delegate tasks or functions to a service organization, the responsibility for the service provided to customers of the user entity cannot be delegated. Management of the user entity is usually held responsible by those charged with governance (for example, the board of directors); customers; shareholders; regulators; and other affected parties for establishing effective internal control over outsourced functions.”

A service organization is part of your financial system of controls if they affect any of the following:

  • The classes of transactions in your operations that are significant to your financial statements;
  • The procedures, both automated and manual, by which your transactions are initiated, recorded, processed, and reported from their occurrence to their inclusion in the financial statements;
  • The related accounting records, whether electronic or manual, supporting information, and specific accounts in your financial statements involved in initiating, recording, processing, and reporting your transactions;
  • How your information system captures other events or conditions that are significant to your financial statements; or
  • The financial reporting process used to prepare your financial statements, including significant accounting estimates and disclosures.

How Do You Know If Your 3rd Party Service Provider Has Adequate Controls?

Systems and Organization Controls (SOC) reports provide user organization management with the information they need related to the service organization’s controls to help assess and address the risks associated with an outsourced service.

SOC 1: Report on Controls at a Service Organization Relevant to User Entities’ Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The SOC 1 report is designed to address internal controls over financial reporting and concentrates on a service organization’s controls as they relate to the processing of your transactions. For example, a payroll processing company receives your records and banking instructions for all employees. This work is outsourced to the payroll company, but you are still responsible for the work and how it impacts your financial statements. If the payroll company cannot demonstrate they have adequate and suitably designed controls that operate effectively, they are viewed as a greater risk to clients and as a result are less likely to be hired for these outsourced services.

AAFCPAs advises our clients to request a SOC 1 from their service providers when the outsourced services have a relationship to their financial reporting.  The SOC report should be assessed by the user organization and controls specified in the User Organization Controls section should be evaluated for whether they should be implemented at the user organization.  Other SOC reports, such as those for subservice providers, should also be requested because the service provider may be relying on the services and controls of the subservice provider.

SOC 2: Report on Controls at a Service Organization Relevant to Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, or Privacy

The SOC 2 report addresses a service organization’s controls for operations related to the security, confidentiality, processing integrity, availability, and privacy of IT, personally identifiable information (PII), and other sensitive information for their clients.  For example, an organization that prints and/or mails statements for hospitals or other medical institutions may require a SOC 2 report. Hospitals often outsource the printing and mailing of client statements to an external vendor. The hired organization receives extensive confidential information, including names, addresses, diagnoses, and medications for patients. A SOC 2 report will provide reasonable assurance that information is securely received and transmitted for the service organization’s clients.

AAFCPAs advises our clients to request a SOC 2 from their service providers when the outsourced services have a relationship to their financial reporting.  The SOC report should be assessed by the user organization and controls specified in the User Organization Controls section should be evaluated for whether they should be implemented at the user organization.  Again, SOC reports for subservice providers should also be requested.

Vendor Risk Management Program

AAFCPAs advises clients to develop, document, and adhere to a vendor risk assessment program, which should include requirements for SOC reports and other attestations. Organizations are urged to only outsource services to a vendor that meets compliance standards.

The controls tested during a SOC 1 report will determine whether the service organization has sufficient internal controls over processes that can impact your company’s financial reporting. Similarly, SOC 2 examinations will test the controls that protect the systems or data of which service organizations have access.

When outsourcing the processing of financials or large amounts of sensitive data, you need to trust that the service organization has the systems and controls in place and in working order to protect your information.

If you have any questions, please contact James Jumes, MBA, M.Ed. at 774.512.4062, jjumes@nullaafcpa.comVassilis Kontoglis at 774.512.4069,; or your AAFCPAs Partner.

About the Authors

James Jumes
James joined AAFCPAs in 2013 to lead the Business Consulting Services practice. He has more than 25 years of experience working with information technology systems and diverse business operational processes. James is highly experienced in IT controls and assurance, SOX 404, and Service Organization Control (SOC) reports: SOC 1 (SSAE 18), SOC 2, SOC 2+ and 3 attestation reporting.  James developed a unique methodology to delivering SOC reporting services, and he is an AICPA-approved Peer Review SOC Specialist, assisting peer review teams to review SOC 1, 2, 2+ and 3 engagements. He is a HITRUST Certified Common Security Framework (CSF) Practitioner, providing HITRUST CSF self-assessment consulting, or SOC 2 + HITRUST for assessing against the evolving compliance landscape shaped by HITECH, HIPAA, CMS and various other federal, state and business requirements.
Vassilis is a leader in AAFCPAs’ Business Process & IT Consulting Practice. He has 20+ years’ proven experience providing business intelligence, productivity, information risk management, and cybersecurity solutions. He is a critical resource in keeping clients and the firm on the forefront of transformative technologies while mitigating risks that come along with these advancements. Vassilis leads the delivery of Robotic Process Automation solutions at AAFCPAs. He understands the unique requirements to achieve RPA success, including proper design, planning, implementation, and governance. He works collaboratively with clients and cross-functional teams, and leverages his deep understanding of enterprise information systems, business logic, and structured inputs to automate rote processes and increase operational efficiency. Vassilis is also the leader of AAFCPAs’ automation center of excellence (CoE), an internal team that streamlines automation output, provides structure, and helps scale automation through the firm.